Monday, April 13, 2009

The New Baryta Papers

Bartya papers, harkening back to some of the glorious silver papers of the darkroom days, have very recently joined the inkjet printing arsenal. It’s big news.

Baryta is really simply another type of mordant (a substance that binds a dye or pigment to a a fabric or fiber material), it’s a barium-sulfate compound, again, much like a clay, bonded to a fibre-based paper substrate. It gives you a very high reflectance, thus a very bright white, without introducing optical whiteners. It’s a particularly helpful trick when it’s used on a flat, matte surface, either on a cellulose (standard wood-chip based), or on a 100% rag (generally referred to as acid-free, archival) paper, to enhance the contrast and dMax of the more absorbent paper bases. (The gloss papers have less of a problem with that, since the coating and even sometimes the base, often a plastic, performs much of the same function as the mordanting.)

Some current examples of Baryta papers are Epson Exhibition Fiber, Ilford Galerie Gold Fiber Silk, Hahnemüle Fine Art Glossy, and Harman Glossy Fiber Base AL, released in 2007. Although that’s quite a while, now, in digital years (very similar to dog years- one digital year equals about 5 years of normal technological development) the papers have been getting great reviews, and gaining a slow, but steady acceptance. Back to Mr. Jensen, the subject of the post where he mentions violins is precisely that- with the release of these new papers, he feel confident that he can produce a print of acceptably high standards, (his), using these new papers.

I have little doubt that you’ll see, within a fairly short time, a much deeper selection of Baryta papers available from many more vendors, including the printer manufacturers as well.

Harman Papers, by the way, is one of the places that Ilford put it's resources after they shut down their traditional darkroom papers line.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, April 9, 2009

site- LensWork Special Editions


I mentioned this briefly before, but I think it deserves some more explanation.

In this post, Brooks Jensen mentions a wonderful description of the importance of paper in the final print:

"I once interviewed Oliver Gagliani and we talked about the intangible nature of paper qualities. He compared the selection of photo paper to the judgment of a fine violin. The way to determine which violin is best is not based on reputation, not based on price, not based on materials, but based on the instrument’s ability to carry over distance.

Oliver explained it this way: If you take a number of violins outdoors into a field and have someone play them while you listen from a distance, some violins just sound better. Up close they might look the same, and from a close range they might even sound the same. But the better violins have the ability to “carry” so much farther.

Oliver simply applied this thinking to photographic papers, too. Sure, he would measure densities, he would look at all the other characteristics of a paper, but his true test was to look at papers from a distance and see which one “carried” the farthest. He was absolutely right. Some papers, seen from across the room, simply look better even though they may have exactly the same densities, similar paper base, the same shade of white, comparable surface textures, etc.

There is a kind of ethereal presence that some papers have that is discernable if you really look and look carefully, which of course, we photographers do."


...he's discussing this in the context of his testing of a new generation of inkjet papers: Epson Exhibition Fiber, Ilford Galerie Gold Fiber Silk, Hahnemüle Fine Art Glossy, and Harman Glossy Fiber Base AL.

See the whole post here.

Labels: ,